引言
第一眼看到这个题目，我相信大家都会脑子里面弹出来一个想法：这不都是 Spring 的注解么，加了这两个注解的类都会被最终封装成 BeanDefinition 交给 Spring 管理，能有什么区别？
首先先给大家看一段示例代码：
AnnotationBean.java
import lombok.Data;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Qualifier;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
@Component
//@Configuration
public class AnnotationBean {
@Qualifier("innerBean1")
@Bean()
public InnerBean innerBean1() {
return new InnerBean();
}
@Bean
public InnerBeanFactory innerBeanFactory() {
InnerBeanFactory factory = new InnerBeanFactory();
factory.setInnerBean(innerBean1());
return factory;
}
public static class InnerBean {
}
@Data
public static class InnerBeanFactory {
private InnerBean innerBean;
}
}AnnotationTest.java
@Test
void test7() {
AnnotationConfigApplicationContext applicationContext = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext(BASE_PACKAGE);
Object bean1 = applicationContext.getBean("innerBean1");
Object factoryBean = applicationContext.getBean("innerBeanFactory");
int hashCode1 = bean1.hashCode();
InnerBean innerBeanViaFactory = ((InnerBeanFactory) factoryBean).getInnerBean();
int hashCode2 = innerBeanViaFactory.hashCode();
Assertions.assertEquals(hashCode1, hashCode2);
}大家可以先猜猜看，这个test7()的执行结果究竟是成功呢还是失败呢？
答案是失败的。如果将AnnotationBean的注解从 @Component 换成 @Configuration，那test7()就会执行成功。
究竟是为什么呢？通常 Spring 管理的 bean 不都是单例的么？
别急，让笔者慢慢道来 ~~~
Spring-source-5.2.8 两个注解声明
以下是摘自 Spring-source-5.2.8 的两个注解的声明
@Target(ElementType.TYPE)
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Documented
@Indexed
public @interface Component {
/**
* The value may indicate a suggestion for a logical component name,
* to be turned into a Spring bean in case of an autodetected component.
* @return the suggested component name, if any (or empty String otherwise)
*/
String value() default "";
}
---------------------------------- 这是分割线 -----------------------------------
@Target(ElementType.TYPE)
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Documented
@Component
public @interface Configuration {
/**
* Explicitly specify the name of the Spring bean definition associated with the
* {@code @Configuration} class. If left unspecified (the common case), a bean
* name will be automatically generated.
* <p>The custom name applies only if the {@code @Configuration} class is picked
* up via component scanning or supplied directly to an
* {@link AnnotationConfigApplicationContext}. If the {@code @Configuration} class
* is registered as a traditional XML bean definition, the name/id of the bean
* element will take precedence.
* @return the explicit component name, if any (or empty String otherwise)
* @see AnnotationBeanNameGenerator
*/
@AliasFor(annotation = Component.class)
String value() default "";
/**
* Specify whether {@code @Bean} methods should get proxied in order to enforce
* bean lifecycle behavior, e.g. to return shared singleton bean instances even
* in case of direct {@code @Bean} method calls in user code. This feature
* requires method interception, implemented through a runtime-generated CGLIB
* subclass which comes with limitations such as the configuration class and
* its methods not being allowed to declare {@code final}.
* <p>The default is {@code true}, allowing for 'inter-bean references' via direct
* method calls within the configuration class as well as for external calls to
* this configuration's {@code @Bean} methods, e.g. from another configuration class.
* If this is not needed since each of this particular configuration's {@code @Bean}
* methods is self-contained and designed as a plain factory method for container use,
* switch this flag to {@code false} in order to avoid CGLIB subclass processing.
* <p>Turning off bean method interception effectively processes {@code @Bean}
* methods individually like when declared on non-{@code @Configuration} classes,
* a.k.a. "@Bean Lite Mode" (see {@link Bean @Bean's javadoc}). It is therefore
* behaviorally equivalent to removing the {@code @Configuration} stereotype.
* @since 5.2
*/
boolean proxyBeanMethods() default true;
}从这两个注解的定义中，可能大家已经看出了一点端倪：@Configuration 比 @Component 多一个成员变量 boolean proxyBeanMethods() 默认值是 true. 从这个成员变量的注释中，我们可以看到一句话
Specify whether {@code @Bean} methods should get proxied in order to enforce bean lifecycle behavior, e.g. to return shared singleton bean instances even in case of direct {@code @Bean} method calls in user code.
其实从这句话，我们就可以初步得到我们想要的答案了：在带有 @Configuration 注解的类中，一个带有 @Bean 注解的方法显式调用另一个带有 @Bean 注解的方法，返回的是共享的单例对象. 下面我们从 Spring 源码实现角度来看看这中间的原理.
从 Spring 源码实现中可以得出一个规律，Spring 作者在实现注解时，通常是先收集解析，再调用。@Configuration是 基于 @Component 实现的，在 @Component 的解析过程中，我们可以看到下面一段逻辑：
org.springframework.context.annotation.ConfigurationClassUtils#checkConfigurationClassCandidate
Map<String, Object> config = metadata.getAnnotationAttributes(Configuration.class.getName());
if (config != null && !Boolean.FALSE.equals(config.get("proxyBeanMethods"))) {
beanDef.setAttribute(CONFIGURATION_CLASS_ATTRIBUTE, CONFIGURATION_CLASS_FULL);
}
else if (config != null || isConfigurationCandidate(metadata)) {
beanDef.setAttribute(CONFIGURATION_CLASS_ATTRIBUTE, CONFIGURATION_CLASS_LITE);
}默认情况下，Spring 在将带有 @Configuration 注解的类封装成 BeanDefinition 的时候，会设置一个属性 CONFIGURATION_CLASS_ATTRIBUTE，属性值为 CONFIGURATION_CLASS_FULL, 反之，如果只有 @Component 注解，那该属性值就会是 CONFIGURATION_CLASS_LITE (这个属性值很重要). 在 @Component 注解的调用过程当中，有下面一段逻辑：
org.springframework.context.annotation.ConfigurationClassPostProcessor#enhanceConfigurationClasses
for (String beanName : beanFactory.getBeanDefinitionNames()) {
......
if ((configClassAttr != null || methodMetadata != null) && beanDef instanceof AbstractBeanDefinition) {
......
if (ConfigurationClassUtils.CONFIGURATION_CLASS_FULL.equals(configClassAttr)) {
if (!(beanDef instanceof AbstractBeanDefinition)) {
throw new BeanDefinitionStoreException("Cannot enhance @Configuration bean definition '"
beanName "' since it is not stored in an AbstractBeanDefinition subclass");
}
else if (logger.isInfoEnabled() && beanFactory.containsSingleton(beanName)) {
logger.info("Cannot enhance @Configuration bean definition '" beanName
"' since its singleton instance has been created too early. The typical cause "
"is a non-static @Bean method with a BeanDefinitionRegistryPostProcessor "
"return type: Consider declaring such methods as 'static'.");
}
configBeanDefs.put(beanName, (AbstractBeanDefinition) beanDef);
}
}
}
if (configBeanDefs.isEmpty()) {
// nothing to enhance -> return immediately
return;
}
ConfigurationClassEnhancer enhancer = new ConfigurationClassEnhancer();
......如果 BeanDefinition 的 ConfigurationClassUtils.CONFIGURATION_CLASS_ATTRIBUTE 属性值为 ConfigurationClassUtils.CONFIGURATION_CLASS_FULL, 则该 BeanDefinition 对象会被加入到 Map<String, AbstractBeanDefinition> configBeanDefs 容器中。
如果 Spring 发现该 Map 是空的，则认为不需要进行代理增强，立即返回；反之，则为该类 (本文中，被代理类即为 AnnotationBean, 以下简称该类) 创建代理。
所以如果该类的注解是 @Component，调用带有 @Bean 注解的 innerBean1() 方法时，this 对象为 Spring 容器中的真实单例对象，例如 AnnotationBean@4149.
@Bean
public InnerBeanFactory innerBeanFactory() {
InnerBeanFactory factory = new InnerBeanFactory();
factory.setInnerBean(innerBean1());
return factory;
}那在上述方法中每调用一次 innerBean1() 方法时，势必会返回一个新创建的 InnerBean 对象。如果该类的注解为 @Configuration 时，this 对象为 Spring 生成的 AnnotationBean 的代理对象，例如 AnnotationBean$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$90f8540c@4296,
增强逻辑
// The callbacks to use. Note that these callbacks must be stateless.
private static final Callback[] CALLBACKS = new Callback[] {
new BeanMethodInterceptor(),
new BeanFactoryAwareMethodInterceptor(),
NoOp.INSTANCE
};
----------------------------------- 这是分割线 -------------------------------
/**
* Creates a new CGLIB {@link Enhancer} instance.
*/
private Enhancer newEnhancer(Class<?> configSuperClass, @Nullable ClassLoader classLoader) {
Enhancer enhancer = new Enhancer();
enhancer.setSuperclass(configSuperClass);
enhancer.setInterfaces(new Class<?>[] {EnhancedConfiguration.class});
enhancer.setUseFactory(false);
enhancer.setNamingPolicy(SpringNamingPolicy.INSTANCE);
enhancer.setStrategy(new BeanFactoryAwareGeneratorStrategy(classLoader));
enhancer.setCallbackFilter(CALLBACK_FILTER);
enhancer.setCallbackTypes(CALLBACK_FILTER.getCallbackTypes());
return enhancer;
}当在上述方法中调用 innerBean1() 时，ConfigurationClassEnhancer 遍历 3 种回调方法判断当前调用应该使用哪个回调方法时，第一个回调类型匹配成功org.springframework.context.annotation.ConfigurationClassEnhancer.BeanMethodInterceptor#isMatch 匹配过程如下所示：
@Override
public boolean isMatch(Method candidateMethod) {
return (candidateMethod.getDeclaringClass() != Object.class && !BeanFactoryAwareMethodInterceptor.isSetBeanFactory(candidateMethod) && BeanAnnotationHelper.isBeanAnnotated(candidateMethod));
}匹配成功之后，使用 org.springframework.context.annotation.ConfigurationClassEnhancer.BeanMethodInterceptor#intercept 对 innerBean1() 方法调用进行拦截. 在本例中，innerBean1() 被增强器调用了两次，第一次调用是 Spring 解析带有 @Bean 注解的 innerBean1() 方法，将构造的 InnerBean 对象加入 Spring 单例池中. 第二次调用是 Spring 解析带有 @Bean 注解的 innerBeanFactory() 方法，在该方法中显式调用 innerBean1(). 在第二次调用时，增强过程如下所示：org.springframework.context.annotation.ConfigurationClassEnhancer.BeanMethodInterceptor#resolveBeanReference
Object beanInstance = (useArgs ? beanFactory.getBean(beanName, beanMethodArgs) : beanFactory.getBean(beanName));
看到这里，相信大家和笔者一样，对 @Component 和 @Configuration 注解的区别豁然开朗：
默认情况下，带有 @Configuration 的类在被 Spring 解析时，会使用切面进行字节码增强，在解析带有 @Bean的方法 innerBeanFactory() 时，该方法内部显式调用了另一个带有 @Bean 注解的方法 innerBean1(), 那么返回的对象和 Spring 第一次解析带有 @Bean 注解的方法 innerBean1() 生成的单例对象是同一个.
以上就是Component和Configuration注解区别实例详解的详细内容，更多关于Component Configuration区别的资料请关注Devmax其它相关文章！